In contrast, I have no such problem of any sort with non-Cineform file conversion of any kind so far with ProCoder 3. And that's all the further I have ever gotten, no matter what with any Cineform encoded file - it matters not what the aspect ratio is, number of pixels, frame rate, fields versus frames, etc., etc. I then entered data for the desired coding, hit the button for encoding, and a window popped up stating "AVI Reader. This Cineform AVI checked out on the Procoder 3 panel regarding such matters as aspect ratio and pixels, but for some reason, though, it was indicated as progressive, indicated upper field first, which I corrected. I installed Procoder 3, and brought into it a Cineform AVI, which I had previously used to produce both a BD-Rs and DVD-Rs, via MainConcept/Encore conventional means. So I purchased what may now turn out for me to be a $470 coaster! Those writing about this appear to have been unequivocal in their opinion and their unreserved praise. I will be writing later of my poor interim solutions (including various levels of Gaussian Blur, etc.), and even though the subject has been beaten to death here and all over the Internet, I will be posting my results and pleading for yours, if they work.īut, to the point! I have read on the Cineform forum here, and on many, many other forums about the notable superiority of Procoder 3 over the MainConcept program in encoding for DVD-R and BD-R. Earlier, I had been thrilled using Cineform Aspect HD, and then Cineform Prospect 4K with all the Adobe programs in producing superb DVD-Rs and BD-Rs from HDV - Sony FX-1 and similar HDV tape based cameras - and ALL of my customers were similarly thrilled! But then I made a major mistake - I purchased the EX-1, and have spent months of unproductive time in attempting to make an acceptable product from this awesome camera. MainConcept encoder, included in Adobe Encore.
For disc encoding, I had been using the often maligned
#Sorenson squeeze 10 progressive dvd pro#
I am attempting to produce acceptable discs from the EX-1 using, as my main machine, a very powerful and (I thought) well configured Boxx PC, with Premiere Pro CS3, Photoshop, After Effects, Encore, etc. Ohhh…and complete side note here – I found that if I import a standard resolution size (720×486) into Sorenson…it AUTOMATICALLY deinterlaces the file!!?!?!? Why would it do that? I accidentally found this, because I placed a filter on a clip and instead of deleting the filter, I just turned everything off…and it didn’t deinterlace it…but if I deleted the filter, it automatically deinterlaced it.Like many of you, I have been disgusted and defeated in attempting to make acceptable DVD-Rs and even BD-Rs from the 1920x1080 30p output of the Sony EX-1. If I run Sorenson without any deinterlacing filter…any moving video has field banding…but my text looks beautiful!ĭo I have to choose? Has anyone else experienced this and come to a middle ground? The video is clean and deinterlaced…but the text looks jagged. So I setup a deinterlace footage filter in Sorenson…but it clips the rounded edges of any text is in the video. With our setup, we’re still shooting standard 30i…we don’t have any progressive options, even though we do most of our production for the web. I start with NTSC D1 Footage – Avid Meridien 2:1 anamorphic 16×9.
Curious if anyone else is having any this same workflow issue with Sorenson Squeeze.
0 kommentar(er)
